Effy AI
Pricing on requestAI-powered performance review and 360 feedback tool that helps HR teams run structured evaluations and development conversations.
Not sure if this tool fits your team? Take the 30s Stack Score →
SourcrLab Take
AI-powered performance review and 360 feedback tool that helps HR teams run structured evaluations and development conversations.
Use if: High-volume hiring teams
Skip if: Requires active bias monitoring and tuning
Better alternative: myInterview . AI-powered video interview platform with smart shortlisting, personality insight…
We may earn a commission if you sign up via our links.
About Effy AI
AI-powered performance review and 360 feedback tool that helps HR teams run structured evaluations and development conversations.
Effy AI helps recruiting teams streamline their hiring workflow with AI-powered automation and intelligent matching. The platform integrates with popular ATS systems and recruiting tools to provide a seamless experience across your entire talent acquisition stack.
Information may change. Always verify on the official website.
Key Features
- AI resume screening & ranking
- Skills assessment tests
- Automated candidate scoring
- Video interview analysis
- Bias reduction algorithms
- Custom evaluation criteria
Best For
- High-volume hiring teams
- Enterprise recruiters
- HR departments with compliance needs
Use Cases
- Resume screening at scale
- Pre-employment testing
- Cultural fit assessment
- Technical skills evaluation
Pros & Cons
Unlock the full shortlist
Get instant access to all 7 additional tools, plus our weekly recruiter stack tips.
Quick Compare
Editor Notes
🎯 Should you use Effy AI?
Buy if: You run 200+ applicants per role and need structured scoring that holds up under compliance review.
Skip if: You hire for non-linear roles where AI scoring flags career gaps as red flags instead of strategic pivots.
⚡ In practice
- ●Setup: 45 minutes to map custom criteria
- ●Resume screening: Cuts 4-hour review to 20 minutes
- ●Video analysis: Flags filler words, not substance
⚠️ Where it breaks
- ●Career changers and self-taught candidates score lower than bootcamp grads with identical portfolios, and you will not notice until someone tells you.
- ●The bias reduction feature exists to sell the tool, not to actually catch when your scoring model replicates hiring manager preferences from 2019.
💸 Is it worth the money?
Free plan covers 10 candidates per month, which is useless for any team claiming "high-volume" needs. Paid tiers are not published, so expect sales calls and custom enterprise pricing that starts around $8,000 per year based on competitor benchmarks.
🆚 If not this
- ●Greenhouse -> Pay $6,800/year for structured scorecards without the AI theater, better ATS integration.
- ●Ashby -> More flexible rubrics, built for teams who actually read resumes before auto-rejecting.
🎯 Final verdict
Buy if compliance audits matter more than candidate experience, skip if you hire people who do not fit cookie-cutter rubrics.
Pricing
Still comparing selection evaluation tools?
Five questions about your team, budget, and biggest pain point. We send the matched shortlist and the price math to your inbox.
Stay ahead of the curve
Weekly tool picks, pricing changes, and new launches. No spam.