Criteria Corp
Pricing on requestPre-employment testing platform with cognitive, personality, and skills assessments powered by AI for objective candidate evaluation.
Not sure if this tool fits your team? Take the 30s Stack Score →
SourcrLab Take
Pre-employment testing platform with cognitive, personality, and skills assessments powered by AI for objective candidate evaluation.
Use if: High-volume hiring teams
Skip if: Algorithmic fairness depends on training data quality
Better alternative: TurboHire . AI-native recruitment platform with automated screening, candidate ranking, and …
We may earn a commission if you sign up via our links.
About Criteria Corp
Pre-employment testing platform with cognitive, personality, and skills assessments powered by AI for objective candidate evaluation.
Criteria Corp helps recruiting teams streamline their hiring workflow with AI-powered automation and intelligent matching. The platform integrates with popular ATS systems and recruiting tools to provide a seamless experience across your entire talent acquisition stack.
Information may change. Always verify on the official website.
Key Features
- AI resume screening & ranking
- Skills assessment tests
- Automated candidate scoring
- Video interview analysis
- Bias reduction algorithms
- Custom evaluation criteria
Best For
- High-volume hiring teams
- Enterprise recruiters
- HR departments with compliance needs
Use Cases
- Resume screening at scale
- Pre-employment testing
- Cultural fit assessment
- Technical skills evaluation
Pros & Cons
Unlock the full shortlist
Get instant access to all 7 additional tools, plus our weekly recruiter stack tips.
Quick Compare
Editor Notes
🎯 Should you use Criteria Corp?
Buy if: You run enterprise-volume hiring and need defensible, standardized testing that passes legal review.
Skip if: You hire under 50 people per year or need pricing transparency before a sales call.
⚡ In practice
- ●Setup: Requires implementation team, weeks not days
- ●Cognitive tests: CCAT runs in 15 minutes, solid validity data
- ●Skills assessments: Typing to Excel, consistent but generic
⚠️ Where it breaks
- ●No published pricing means every deal is a negotiation, and small teams get priced out or ignored.
- ●AI scoring works for structured roles but flags career changers and non-linear paths as risky.
💸 Is it worth the money?
Expect $3,000-$15,000 annually depending on volume, with per-test fees on top. Worth it if you need audit trails and adverse impact reports, not worth it if you just want to add a quick screening step.
🆚 If not this
- ●Wonderlic -> simpler cognitive tests, faster setup, better for mid-sized teams
- ●TestGorilla -> cheaper per-candidate pricing, published rates, weaker legal defensibility
- ●Pymetrics -> neuroscience-based games if you want differentiation and can stomach the cost
🎯 Final verdict
Buy for compliance-heavy enterprise hiring where test validity matters in court, skip if you want transparent pricing or hire fewer than 200 people annually.
Pricing
Still comparing selection evaluation tools?
Five questions about your team, budget, and biggest pain point. We send the matched shortlist and the price math to your inbox.
Stay ahead of the curve
Weekly tool picks, pricing changes, and new launches. No spam.