Skip to content
SourcrLab
SHL logo

SHL

Pricing on request

Global talent assessment provider with AI-powered evaluations. Cognitive, behavioral, and job simulation assessments.

Not sure if this tool fits your team? Take the 30s Stack Score →

SourcrLab Take

57/100

Global talent assessment provider with AI-powered evaluations.

Use if: High-volume teams

Skip if: Fairness monitoring is essential with any AI-driven tool

Better alternative: Sterling . Enterprise background screening and identity verification. Drug testing, crimina…

6.7Sourcr Score6.7/10
890 reviews
Pricing on requestHigh-volume teamsEnterprise HRTechnical hiring
View Pricing

We may earn a commission if you sign up via our links.

About SHL

Global talent assessment provider with AI-powered evaluations. Cognitive, behavioral, and job simulation assessments.

Information may change. Always verify on the official website.

Key Features

  • AI resume screening
  • Skills assessments
  • Automated scoring
  • Video analysis
  • Bias reduction
  • Custom criteria

Best For

  • High-volume teams
  • Enterprise HR
  • Technical hiring

Use Cases

  • Resume screening
  • Technical assessment
  • Personality testing
  • Skills evaluation

Pros & Cons

+7 more tools

Unlock the full shortlist

Get instant access to all 7 additional tools, plus our weekly recruiter stack tips.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe.

Quick Compare

ToolRatingPricingFree Plan
Sterling logoSterling5.6Pricing on requestCompare
Checkr logoCheckr6.3Pricing on requestCompare
Bryq logoBryq5.6Pricing on requestCompare

Editor Notes

🎯 Should you use SHL?

Buy if: You run 500+ hires a year and need psychometric assessments defensible in court.

Skip if: You're hiring under 200 people annually or need pricing transparency before a sales call.

⚡ In practice

  • Setup: 4-6 weeks with dedicated implementation team
  • Candidate flow: Tests take 45-90 minutes, dropout rate around 30%
  • Scoring: Auto-generated reports in 48 hours, benchmarked against 200M+ data points

⚠️ Where it breaks

  • No public pricing means you negotiate blind against a team that closes Fortune 500 deals daily.
  • Candidates hate the length and the clinical feel, especially for non-executive roles where culture fit matters more than cognitive scores.

💸 Is it worth the money?

Contracts start around $50K annually for mid-market and climb fast with volume. Worth it if you're defending hiring decisions in regulated industries or scaling past 1,000 hires where bias lawsuits are real risk, not if you're a 12-person startup hiring generalists.

🆚 If not this

  • Criteria -> Same psychometric rigor, public pricing, built for tech hiring instead of enterprise HR
  • TestGorilla -> $200/month for small teams, less science but actual transparency
  • Wonderlic -> Cognitive-only alternative at half the cost when you don't need behavioral modules

🎯 Final verdict

Buy for enterprise compliance and volume, skip if you value speed or need to know what you're paying before a three-call sales cycle.

Pricing

Pricing on request

Enterprise

Still comparing selection evaluation tools?

Five questions about your team, budget, and biggest pain point. We send the matched shortlist and the price math to your inbox.

Browse Top Picks

Stay ahead of the curve

Weekly tool picks, pricing changes, and new launches. No spam.