Is Kaspr or Lusha more affordable?

Kaspr pricing: Freemium. Lusha pricing: Freemium (from $36/month). Kaspr offers a free plan.

All comparisons

Kaspr

60/100

LinkedIn contact data extraction tool. Get phone numbers and emails from LinkedIn profiles in one click.

Lusha

70/100

B2B contact enrichment platform providing direct dials and email addresses. Popular Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting among recruiters.

Kaspr vs Lusha

The Verdict

Rating 7.8/10

🏆

Our pick

Lusha

Read the verdict

Pick Kaspr if

you want a simple, affordable LinkedIn contact extraction tool for individual recruiters or small teams.

Pick Lusha if

you need a more established platform with broader data coverage, enterprise features, and deeper CRM integrations.

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall

Lusha

Rating 7.8/5

Best value

Kaspr

Free plan available

Best for specialized needs

Kaspr

Sourcers

Summary

Kaspr and Lusha are both LinkedIn-focused contact data tools that provide phone numbers and email addresses for recruiting outreach. Kaspr offers one-click extraction of contact data from LinkedIn profiles with a straightforward Chrome extension. Lusha is a more established B2B contact enrichment platform with a broader database and deeper CRM integrations. Kaspr tends to be more affordable and simpler to use, while Lusha provides more verified data points and enterprise features.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Kaspr	Lusha
Pricing	Pricing on request	Pricing on request(Starting from $36/month)
Free Plan	Yes	Yes
Free Trial	No	No
Key Features	AI candidate search Contact info finder LinkedIn integration Boolean search Talent pool management Data enrichment	B2B contact enrichment Chrome extension Salesforce integration Team credits management GDPR & CCPA compliant API access
Best For	Sourcers Agency recruiters TA teams	Corporate recruiting teams Staffing agencies Tech recruiters Sourcers
Pros	Efficient sourcing workflows save significant time Discovers passive candidates across multiple channels More precise candidate-to-role matching Syncs smoothly with popular ATS systems	Eliminates manual talent search across platforms Reaches beyond job boards into passive talent pools Smarter candidate-job fit through machine learning Plugs into most popular ATS platforms via API
Cons	Verification rates differ by industry and seniority Complex interface may frustrate less technical users Not cost-effective for individual recruiters	Data quality depends on how recently profiles were updated New users may underutilize advanced search at first Cost may not justify for low-volume hiring

Kaspr. Pricing Details

Freemium

Lusha. Pricing Details

Freemium - Free plan with 50 credits/month, paid from $36/month

Visit Kaspr Visit Lusha

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections

⚖️Apollo.io vs Lusha ⚖️ContactOut vs Lusha ⚖️Apollo.io vs Kaspr 🛠️Kaspr. Full Review 🛠️Lusha. Full Review 🛠️Kaspr Alternatives 🛠️Lusha Alternatives 📋Best Passive Candidate Sourcing Tools for Startups

← View all comparisons