Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
Lusha logo

Lusha

70/100

B2B contact enrichment platform providing direct dials and email addresses. Popular Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting among recruiters.

VS
Adapt.io logo

Adapt.io

60/100

B2B contact database with 200M+ verified business contacts. Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting by recruiters.

Lusha vs Adapt.io

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Lusha
Rating 7.8/5
Best value
Adapt.io
Free plan available
Best for specialized needs
Adapt.io
Sourcers

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLushaAdapt.io
PricingPricing on request(Starting from $36/month)Pricing on request
Free PlanYesYes
Free TrialNoNo
Key Features
  • B2B contact enrichment
  • Chrome extension
  • Salesforce integration
  • Team credits management
  • GDPR & CCPA compliant
  • API access
  • AI candidate search
  • Contact info finder
  • LinkedIn integration
  • Boolean search
  • Talent pool management
  • Data enrichment
Best For
  • Corporate recruiting teams
  • Staffing agencies
  • Tech recruiters
  • Sourcers
  • Sourcers
  • Agency recruiters
  • TA teams
Pros
  • Eliminates manual talent search across platforms
  • Reaches beyond job boards into passive talent pools
  • Smarter candidate-job fit through machine learning
  • Plugs into most popular ATS platforms via API
  • Automates the most time-consuming sourcing tasks
  • Broadens talent pool beyond active applicants
  • Higher accuracy in skills and experience matching
  • Pushes data directly to your existing ATS
Cons
  • Data quality depends on how recently profiles were updated
  • New users may underutilize advanced search at first
  • Cost may not justify for low-volume hiring
  • Older profiles may have stale contact information
  • Onboarding takes longer than simpler alternatives
  • Price point favors well-funded talent teams

Lusha. Pricing Details

Freemium - Free plan with 50 credits/month, paid from $36/month

Visit LushaVisit Adapt.io

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections