Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
Adapt.io logo

Adapt.io

60/100

B2B contact database with 200M+ verified business contacts. Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting by recruiters.

VS
Lusha logo

Lusha

70/100

B2B contact enrichment platform providing direct dials and email addresses. Popular Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting among recruiters.

Adapt.io vs Lusha

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Lusha
Rating 7.8/5
Best value
Adapt.io
Free plan available
Best for specialized needs
Adapt.io
Sourcers

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureAdapt.ioLusha
PricingPricing on requestPricing on request(Starting from $36/month)
Free PlanYesYes
Free TrialNoNo
Key Features
  • AI candidate search
  • Contact info finder
  • LinkedIn integration
  • Boolean search
  • Talent pool management
  • Data enrichment
  • B2B contact enrichment
  • Chrome extension
  • Salesforce integration
  • Team credits management
  • GDPR & CCPA compliant
  • API access
Best For
  • Sourcers
  • Agency recruiters
  • TA teams
  • Corporate recruiting teams
  • Staffing agencies
  • Tech recruiters
  • Sourcers
Pros
  • Automates the most time-consuming sourcing tasks
  • Broadens talent pool beyond active applicants
  • Higher accuracy in skills and experience matching
  • Pushes data directly to your existing ATS
  • Eliminates manual talent search across platforms
  • Reaches beyond job boards into passive talent pools
  • Smarter candidate-job fit through machine learning
  • Plugs into most popular ATS platforms via API
Cons
  • Older profiles may have stale contact information
  • Onboarding takes longer than simpler alternatives
  • Price point favors well-funded talent teams
  • Data quality depends on how recently profiles were updated
  • New users may underutilize advanced search at first
  • Cost may not justify for low-volume hiring

Lusha. Pricing Details

Freemium - Free plan with 50 credits/month, paid from $36/month

Visit Adapt.ioVisit Lusha

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections