Hired

🎯 Should you use Hired?

Buy if: You hire US-based tech talent at volume and want candidates to apply to you instead of cold outreach.

Skip if: You need pricing transparency, hire outside tech, or run a small team that can't justify opaque enterprise contracts.

⚡ In practice

• ●Setup: Unpublished, but expect multi-week sales cycle and contract negotiation
• ●Candidate flow: Vetted talent applies to your roles directly
• ●Salary transparency: Built-in ranges reduce lowball offers and ghosting

⚠️ Where it breaks

• ●No published pricing means you negotiate blind against competitors who locked better rates.
• ●Marketplace model works only if your comp and brand attract applies, otherwise you pay for an empty pipeline.

💸 Is it worth the money?

Pricing stays hidden until a sales call, which signals enterprise SaaS tax and multi-seat minimums. If your tech hiring volume justifies a dedicated marketplace and you close 10+ roles per quarter, the math works. Otherwise, hireEZ or Gem give you sourcing control without the black-box contract.

🆚 If not this

• ●hireEZ -> Direct sourcing with transparent per-seat pricing and better international coverage
• ●Gem -> Full CRM and outbound sequencing if you need active candidate outreach, not inbound applies

🎯 Final verdict

Skip unless you hire US tech at scale and value inbound applies over sourcing control.