AmazingHiring

🎯 Should you use AmazingHiring?

Buy if: You hire 20+ tech roles per year and need passive candidates from GitHub, StackOverflow, or Kaggle without paying LinkedIn Recruiter prices.

Skip if: You hire non-tech roles, recruit fewer than 10 people annually, or need transparent pricing before a sales call.

⚡ In practice

• ●Setup: No published onboarding timeline, sales-only process
• ●Tech sourcing: Pulls from GitHub, StackOverflow, Kaggle automatically
• ●Contact enrichment: Returns emails and phone numbers when available
• ●Boolean builder: Requires learning platform-specific syntax, not standard Boolean

⚠️ Where it breaks

• ●No published pricing means you negotiate blind against your headcount and tech stack.
• ●Data completeness drops hard outside North America and Western Europe, especially for frontend developers and designers.

💸 Is it worth the money?

Pricing is enterprise-only, so expect $8K-$15K annually based on comparable tools like hireEZ or Gem. If you source 2+ tech hires monthly, the math works. If you hire sporadically or mostly non-tech, Loxo or ContactOut cost less and publish prices.

🆚 If not this

• ●hireEZ -> Better data coverage for US tech roles, clearer seat-based pricing
• ●Gem -> Stronger ATS integrations and sequencing if you already use Greenhouse or Lever
• ●ContactOut -> Cheaper per-seat option if you only need email enrichment, not full profiles

🎯 Final verdict

Buy for high-volume tech recruiting where GitHub and StackOverflow matter more than LinkedIn, skip if you need pricing transparency or hire outside software engineering.