Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
62/100AI-powered people search engine using natural language. Search 800M+ profiles by describing your ideal candidate instead of Boolean strings.
Perfectly
35/100YC W26 - First AI-native recruiting agency. 20x higher efficiency, 4x faster hiring, 10x candidate volume.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Perfectly
**Pick Juicebox (PeopleGPT) if:** - You have in-house sourcers or recruiters who do their own search - You want predictable monthly pricing and control over candidate pipelines - You're hiring 5+ people per month and need search volume **Pick Perfectly if:** - You have zero sourcing capacity and won't build it - You're okay outsourcing the entire top-of-funnel to an early vendor - You can tolerate opaque pricing and agency dependency **Skip both if:** - You're hiring fewer than 3 people per quarter. LinkedIn Recruiter Lite is enough **Verdict:** Juicebox is a tool for teams that source; Perfectly is an agency for teams that don't.
Our verdict. Which one wins?
Summary
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is a search tool you buy and operate yourself. You get access to 800M+ profiles, natural language search that converts plain-English descriptions into candidate lists, and contact enrichment. You're still doing the sourcing, screening, and outreach. Juicebox just speeds up finding names. It starts at $79/month with a free tier, has 123 reviews, and lives in your stack as a Gem or SeekOut alternative. You control the workflow, own the pipeline, and decide how deep to go on each search. Perfectly is a recruiting agency that happens to use AI. They're YC W26, promise 4x faster hiring and 10x candidate volume, but don't list pricing or explain what "20x higher efficiency" means in practice. With 12 reviews and a 6.3 rating, they're early-stage and unproven at scale. You're outsourcing the entire sourcing function to them, not buying software. They claim to handle search, outreach, and screening, but the tradeoff is less control, unclear cost structure, and dependence on their team's capacity and judgment. The real decision: do you want a tool that makes your team faster, or do you want to hire an agency to do it for you? Juicebox gives you leverage and transparency at a fixed monthly cost. Perfectly offloads the work but introduces agency risk. misaligned incentives, black-box pricing, and less visibility into how candidates are surfaced and vetted. If you have a sourcing function and want to scale it, buy Juicebox. If you don't have sourcers and won't hire them, Perfectly might fill the gap, but you're betting on an unproven vendor with almost no public track record.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Perfectly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Pricing on request(Starting from $79/month) | Pricing on request |
| Free Plan | Yes | No |
| Free Trial | No | No |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Best For |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Juicebox (PeopleGPT). Pricing Details
Freemium - Free tier, paid from $79/month
Perfectly. Pricing Details
Paid - Success fee model