Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
HireEZ logo

HireEZ

67/100

AI-powered outbound recruiting platform for sourcing and engaging talent.

VS
Swordfish AI logo

Swordfish AI

62/100

AI-powered contact finder providing cell phone numbers and personal emails. Chrome extension works on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub.

HireEZ vs Swordfish AI

The Verdict
Rating 7.0/10
🏆

Our pick

Swordfish AI

**Pick HireEZ if:** - You hire 15+ roles per month and need diversity reporting - Your budget supports $169/user/month for full-team access - You source beyond LinkedIn: GitHub, Stack Overflow, niche boards **Pick Swordfish AI if:** - You're a solo sourcer or small agency under 5 recruiters - Phone and SMS outreach is your primary candidate engagement channel - You want a free tier to test before committing $99/month **Skip both if:** - You need verified contact data for compliance-heavy industries (healthcare, finance) **Verdict:** HireEZ for corporate diversity hiring at scale; Swordfish AI for lean teams prioritizing phone outreach speed.

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Swordfish AI
Rating 7.0/5
Best value
Swordfish AI
Free plan available
Best for specialized needs
HireEZ
Corporate recruiting teams

Summary

HireEZ and Swordfish AI both aggregate candidate contact data, but they diverge on scope and pricing structure. HireEZ pulls from 45+ sources with a focus on diversity filters and enterprise-grade search depth. It's built for teams running high-volume hiring pipelines who need LinkedIn sourcing plus passive candidate discovery across the open web. Swordfish AI is narrower: it's a contact finder first, operating mainly through a Chrome extension on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub. It delivers cell numbers and personal emails at a lower price point ($99/month vs. $169/user/month) and includes a free tier. HireEZ requires upfront investment per seat and has a steeper learning curve for boolean logic. Swordfish AI is faster to onboard but lacks the candidate aggregation breadth and diversity tooling HireEZ offers. Both suffer from contact accuracy gaps-unverified or outdated records are common. HireEZ scales better for corporate teams with 15+ requisitions per month who need compliance-ready diversity reporting. Swordfish AI fits lean sourcers or agencies prioritizing speed and phone outreach over data comprehensiveness.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureHireEZSwordfish AI
PricingPricing on request(Starting from $169/user/month)Pricing on request(Starting from $99/month)
Free PlanNoYes
Free TrialYesNo
Key Features
  • AI boolean search builder
  • Candidate data aggregation from 45+ sources
  • Diversity sourcing filters
  • Chrome extension for LinkedIn
  • Market talent insights
  • 45+ open web data sources
  • Market talent insights & analytics
  • Automated email sequencing
  • AI-powered candidate search
  • Boolean search builder
  • Candidate data enrichment
  • Contact info finder (email & phone)
  • LinkedIn integration
  • Talent pool management
Best For
  • Corporate recruiting teams
  • Staffing agencies
  • Diversity-focused hiring
  • Corporate recruiting teams
  • Staffing agencies
  • Tech recruiters
  • Sourcers
Pros
  • Excellent sourcing depth across open web
  • Strong diversity and inclusion filters
  • Intuitive Chrome extension
  • Good integration with major ATS platforms
  • Automates repetitive sourcing tasks effectively
  • Taps into candidates who aren't actively looking
  • AI scoring surfaces best-fit candidates faster
  • Complements your current stack. no rip-and-replace needed
Cons
  • Can be expensive for smaller teams
  • Learning curve for advanced boolean searches
  • Contact info accuracy varies
  • Contact records aren't always verified or up to date
  • Advanced filtering requires recruiting-ops expertise
  • Best suited for 10+ hires per quarter

Swordfish AI. Pricing Details

Freemium - Limited free plan, paid from $99/month

Visit HireEZVisit Swordfish AI

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections