HireEZ vs Moonhub

Summary

HireEZ is a multichannel sourcing tool you operate yourself. You build boolean strings (or let AI help), scrape 45+ sources, and export contact data. It's built for sourcers who want control over the query and need volume fast. The Chrome extension lives in your LinkedIn workflow. Diversity filters and aggregation are the standout features. You pay $169 per seat monthly, and smaller teams often find that steep when they're only filling 3-5 roles a quarter. Moonhub positions itself as an autonomous agent, not a database you query. You describe the role, and the AI scouts from 1B+ profiles with less hands-on boolean work. The selling point is passive candidate outreach at scale with personalized messaging drafted by the system. Pricing isn't public, but early adopters report it's structured around hires or engagement tiers, not per-seat. The trade is less manual control for higher velocity on hard-to-fill roles. If you're a one-person team doing executive search or niche technical hiring, Moonhub's automation can replace hours of LinkedIn scrolling. If you run a 10-recruiter agency with standardized roles, HireEZ's transparency and per-seat cost might be cleaner. The real fork: HireEZ assumes you want to drive the search. Moonhub assumes you want the AI to do the first pass and you'll review the shortlist. Neither is a cheap ATS bolt-on. Both lean into outbound, not inbound applicants.