Pinpoint

🎯 Should you use Pinpoint?

Buy if: You run an in-house team of 5-15 recruiters who need structured interview scorecards and blind screening without Greenhouse's $18k/year minimum.

Skip if: You hire fewer than 50 people per year or need deep agency features like candidate ownership rules and multi-client portals.

⚡ In practice

• ●Setup: 2-3 weeks with manual data cleanup from old systems
• ●Blind screening: Works but adds friction when hiring managers want names upfront
• ●Interview scheduling: Calendar sync breaks with Outlook enterprise setups regularly

⚠️ Where it breaks

• ●Per-user pricing hits $7,200/year for a 12-person team, more than Ashby's flat $12k for unlimited seats.
• ●Reporting dashboard locks custom fields behind enterprise tier, so you cannot track source quality without a sales call.

💸 Is it worth the money?

$600/month gets you core ATS functions plus structured scorecards that Bullhorn charges $3k/month for. You pay for features most mid-market teams actually use, not bloat.

🆚 If not this

• ●Ashby -> Flat $12k/year for unlimited users if your team is 8+ recruiters
• ●Greenhouse -> Better integrations and reporting if you clear 150 hires/year and have budget for $1,500/month minimums
• ●Lever -> Stronger CRM layer if you source passive candidates more than you process inbound applicants

🎯 Final verdict

Solid pick for 10-60 person in-house teams who want structured hiring without enterprise ATS tax, but per-seat pricing kills the value past 15 recruiters.