Humanly
Pricing on requestConversational AI for screening, scheduling, and interview note-taking.
Not sure if this tool fits your team? Take the 30s Stack Score →
SourcrLab Take
Conversational AI for screening, scheduling, and interview note-taking.
Use if: Mid-market companies
Skip if: Smaller company, less brand recognition
Better alternative: XOR . AI recruiting chatbot and virtual career fair platform that automates screening,…
We may earn a commission if you sign up via our links.
About Humanly
Humanly is a conversational AI platform designed to automate the early stages of the recruiting process. The platform offers AI-powered chat screening, automated scheduling, and real-time interview note-taking with AI-generated summaries. Humanly focuses on reducing bias in screening by using structured, consistent conversations with every candidate. The platform integrates with major ATS systems and provides analytics on screening effectiveness and candidate sentiment.
Information may change. Always verify on the official website.
Key Features
- AI conversational screening
- Automated interview scheduling
- Real-time interview note-taking
- Bias reduction through structured screening
- Candidate sentiment analytics
- Conversational AI chatbot
- Candidate sentiment analysis
- Bias-reduction in screening
- Video interview analysis
Best For
- Mid-market companies
- Teams focused on DEI hiring
- Companies with high applicant volume
Use Cases
- Automated candidate screening
- Interview scheduling automation
- Interview documentation and summaries
Pros & Cons
Unlock the full shortlist
Get instant access to all 7 additional tools, plus our weekly recruiter stack tips.
Quick Compare
Editor Notes
🎯 Should you use Humanly?
Buy if: You run mid-volume screens (50-200/month) and want consistent, bias-reduced candidate conversations without building custom flows.
Skip if: You need hyper-custom screening logic or hire hourly workers at scale where $250/month per seat doesn't math out.
⚡ In practice
- ●Setup: 2-3 hours linking ATS, writing screening templates
- ●Chat screening: Works well for structured questions, clunky on nuance
- ●Interview notes: Solid summaries, saves 10 minutes post-call
⚠️ Where it breaks
- ●Screening flows are rigid-if your questions branch based on answers, you'll hit walls fast.
- ●Candidate sentiment analytics sound useful but mostly surface "positive/neutral/negative" labels that don't change your hiring decisions.
💸 Is it worth the money?
$250/month is reasonable if you're screening 75+ candidates monthly and want consistent documentation. Below that volume, you're paying $3+ per screen, which is expensive for what amounts to structured question automation.
🆚 If not this
- ●Paradox Olivia -> bigger brand, better for hourly hiring at McDonald's-level scale
- ●Greenhouse -> build your own screening workflows if you already pay for their ATS
🎯 Final verdict
Buy if you need bias-reduced screening at mid-volume and don't want to DIY it.
Pricing
Still comparing engagement conversion tools?
Five questions about your team, budget, and biggest pain point. We send the matched shortlist and the price math to your inbox.
Stay ahead of the curve
Weekly tool picks, pricing changes, and new launches. No spam.