Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
Ashby logo

Ashby

67/100

All-in-one recruiting platform with built-in analytics, ATS, CRM, and scheduling.

VS
Gem logo

Gem

47/100

All-in-one recruiting platform with CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics.

Ashby vs Gem

The Verdict
Rating 6.7/10
🏆

Our pick

Gem

**Pick Ashby if:** - You're replacing an ATS entirely or choosing your first one - You want one platform for apply-to-offer, not layered tools - Transparent pricing matters and you're under 50 employees **Pick Gem if:** - You already have an ATS and need outbound sourcing firepower - Your bottleneck is top-of-funnel, not coordination or scheduling - You're doing heavy LinkedIn sourcing and automated outreach sequences **Skip both if:** - You're under 10 people hiring 1-2 roles per year-use Lever or free tools **Verdict:** Ashby replaces your ATS; Gem supercharges sourcing on top of one.

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Gem
Rating 6.7/5
Best value
Ashby
From $300/month
Best for specialized needs
Ashby
Venture-backed startups

Summary

Ashby and Gem both target startups that want analytics-driven recruiting, but they split on what they replace. Ashby is a full ATS with CRM and analytics built in-it's your system of record. You run requisitions, coordinate interviews, track candidates from apply to offer, and get reporting without Greenhouse or Lever. Gem started as a sourcing CRM and added more: you use it alongside an ATS (or as a lightweight standalone for early teams). It excels at outbound-automated sequences, LinkedIn integration, pipeline tracking before someone applies. Ashby is for teams ready to rip out their ATS and go all-in on one platform. Gem is for teams that want to own the top of funnel and either keep their existing ATS or defer that decision. The analytics overlap is real but the focus differs. Ashby's dashboards center on interview efficiency, funnel conversion, offer acceptance-post-application metrics. Gem's analytics track outreach performance, response rates, sourcing channel attribution-pre-application metrics. Both have modern UIs and fast performance. Pricing: Ashby starts at $300/month with transparent tiers. Gem uses custom pricing, typically higher, and features vary by tier. Ashby's integration ecosystem is newer; Gem plugs into most major ATSs (Greenhouse, Lever, Workday). If you're a 20-person Series A hiring 3-5 people per month, Ashby consolidates your stack. If you're a 100-person Series B with Greenhouse and a sourcing problem, Gem layers on top without ripping anything out.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureAshbyGem
PricingPricing on request(Starting from $300/month)Pricing on request(Starting from Custom pricing)
Free PlanNoNo
Free TrialYesYes
Key Features
  • All-in-one ATS, CRM, and scheduling
  • Built-in recruiting analytics engine
  • Automated interview scheduling
  • Pipeline health dashboards
  • Customizable reporting
  • Built-in recruiting analytics
  • Structured interview kits
  • Automated scheduling with panel support
  • Custom workflows and approvals
  • Offer management
  • Talent CRM with pipeline management
  • Automated email outreach sequences
  • Deep pipeline analytics and reporting
  • LinkedIn integration and sourcing
  • Interview scheduling coordination
  • AI-powered ATS
  • Integrated CRM and sourcing
  • Talent marketing automation
  • Pipeline analytics
  • Multi-channel outreach sequencing
Best For
  • Venture-backed startups
  • Analytics-focused recruiting teams
  • Companies wanting to consolidate tools
  • Growth-stage startups
  • Mid-market companies
  • Data-driven recruiting teams
Pros
  • Best built-in analytics of any ATS
  • All-in-one reduces tool sprawl
  • Modern UI and fast performance
  • Excellent customer support
  • Best-in-class pipeline analytics
  • Seamless LinkedIn and ATS integration
  • Intuitive and well-designed UI
  • Strong customer success team
Cons
  • Newer platform with evolving features
  • Integration ecosystem still growing
  • May lack some enterprise-grade features
  • Custom pricing can be opaque
  • Can overlap with ATS features
  • Some advanced features require higher tiers
Visit AshbyVisit Gem

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections